« The sea can teach harsh lessons about the First Commandment | Main | Our brains can deceive us, even about wine »

May 06, 2008

Being smart can be bad for your health - NY Times

From Carl Zimmer, Lots of Animals Learn, but Smarter Isn’t Better, NY Times, May 6, 2008:

Dr. Kawecki and like-minded scientists are trying to figure out why animals learn and why some have evolved to be better at learning than others.  One reason for the difference, their research finds, is that being smart can be bad for an animal’s health.

* * *

The benefits of learning must have been enormous for evolution to have overcome those costs, Dr. Kawecki argues. For many animals, learning mainly offers a benefit in finding food or a mate. But humans also live in complex societies where learning has benefits, as well.

Read it all.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca5a053ef00e55212ae668833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Being smart can be bad for your health - NY Times:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

My Photo

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Favorite Posts

Google Ads


Adv.

Episcopal Church

  • Come and Grow

Advertisement

Blog powered by TypePad