« Christianism and Islamism as neurotic responses to modernity - Andrew Sullivan | Main | Rocky Mountain News was not above inventing its news »

February 08, 2009

Comments

Fraulien

I think it is a good point that science is supposed to be objective. If you read some of the research on this, you find that is not necessarily true. People who call themselves "scientists" have their own set of underlying presuppositions. Dr. Jonathan Haidt has done some very interesting work at the University of Virginia demonstrating this. The book, The Closing of the American Mind by Bloom also demonstrated that there is a big reinforcement in academic circles for "new and different" when it came to publishing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Favorite Posts

Adv.

Episcopal Church

  • Come and Grow